From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Feb 1 16:43:15 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C68016A420 for ; Wed, 1 Feb 2006 16:43:15 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from cswiger@mac.com) Received: from pi.codefab.com (pi.codefab.com [199.103.21.227]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1E84C43D45 for ; Wed, 1 Feb 2006 16:43:15 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from cswiger@mac.com) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pi.codefab.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7BFC85C73; Wed, 1 Feb 2006 11:43:14 -0500 (EST) Received: from pi.codefab.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (pi.codefab.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 89882-03; Wed, 1 Feb 2006 11:43:13 -0500 (EST) Received: from [192.168.1.3] (pool-68-161-67-226.ny325.east.verizon.net [68.161.67.226]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pi.codefab.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 82A605C16; Wed, 1 Feb 2006 11:43:13 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <43E0E521.5010302@mac.com> Date: Wed, 01 Feb 2006 11:43:13 -0500 From: Chuck Swiger Organization: The Courts of Chaos User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5 (Windows/20051201) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Erich Dollansky References: <43E0E23C.6060908@pacific.net.sg> In-Reply-To: <43E0E23C.6060908@pacific.net.sg> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.94.0.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at codefab.com Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [Fwd: Segmentation Fault in OpenOffice after upgrading to 2.0.1] X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 01 Feb 2006 16:43:15 -0000 Erich Dollansky wrote: > I posted this just by mistake to ports. > > What is the difference between ports and freebsd-ports? There is no difference; they are two names or aliases for the same list. [ ...problem with OO 2.0->2.01... ] > The portstree was a few minutes old when I started the process. > > Is this a known problem? > > What can I do to pin it down? Lack of data. It would help to run the program under gdb, or look at the backtrace if you've got a coredump available. Perhaps you should re-update your ports and verify that all dependencies have been rebuilt. -- -Chuck