From owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jul 18 22:01:29 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: emulation@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx2.freebsd.org (mx2.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::35]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C9631065679; Mon, 18 Jul 2011 22:01:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dougb@FreeBSD.org) Received: from 65-241-43-4.globalsuite.net (hub.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::36]) by mx2.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4146715F0D1; Mon, 18 Jul 2011 22:00:58 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <4E24AD19.20403@FreeBSD.org> Date: Mon, 18 Jul 2011 15:00:57 -0700 From: Doug Barton Organization: http://SupersetSolutions.com/ User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:5.0) Gecko/20110706 Thunderbird/5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Mark Linimon References: <20110717024710.GA19599@lonesome.com> <4E241503.20401@FreeBSD.org> <20110718212853.GB31033@lonesome.com> In-Reply-To: <20110718212853.GB31033@lonesome.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.2pre OpenPGP: id=1A1ABC84 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: emulation@FreeBSD.org, Gabor Kovesdan Subject: Re: RFC: small patch to linux_base files for package building X-BeenThere: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Development of Emulators of other operating systems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 18 Jul 2011 22:01:29 -0000 On 07/18/2011 14:28, Mark Linimon wrote: > On Mon, Jul 18, 2011 at 12:12:03PM +0100, Gabor Kovesdan wrote: >> No strong objection from me, however, I would definitely be happier >> to see this code as part of bsd.port.mk as I proposed in >> http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=ports/135221 Doing it properly in bpm does indeed seem preferable. > I agree that this should be tested ... but there is a lot of code there > that I didn't have time to puzzle through for my current -exp run. > > If the stanzas in the ports go away, then my hack goes away as well :-) > Consider it temporary in the meantime. Unfortunately our "temporary" hacks seem to have a habit of becoming less so over time. Doing it properly in the first place helps nip that in the bud. Doug -- Nothin' ever doesn't change, but nothin' changes much. -- OK Go Breadth of IT experience, and depth of knowledge in the DNS. Yours for the right price. :) http://SupersetSolutions.com/