Date: Mon, 18 Jul 2011 15:00:57 -0700 From: Doug Barton <dougb@FreeBSD.org> To: Mark Linimon <linimon@lonesome.com> Cc: emulation@FreeBSD.org, Gabor Kovesdan <gabor@FreeBSD.org> Subject: Re: RFC: small patch to linux_base files for package building Message-ID: <4E24AD19.20403@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <20110718212853.GB31033@lonesome.com> References: <20110717024710.GA19599@lonesome.com> <4E241503.20401@FreeBSD.org> <20110718212853.GB31033@lonesome.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 07/18/2011 14:28, Mark Linimon wrote: > On Mon, Jul 18, 2011 at 12:12:03PM +0100, Gabor Kovesdan wrote: >> No strong objection from me, however, I would definitely be happier >> to see this code as part of bsd.port.mk as I proposed in >> http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=ports/135221 Doing it properly in bpm does indeed seem preferable. > I agree that this should be tested ... but there is a lot of code there > that I didn't have time to puzzle through for my current -exp run. > > If the stanzas in the ports go away, then my hack goes away as well :-) > Consider it temporary in the meantime. Unfortunately our "temporary" hacks seem to have a habit of becoming less so over time. Doing it properly in the first place helps nip that in the bud. Doug -- Nothin' ever doesn't change, but nothin' changes much. -- OK Go Breadth of IT experience, and depth of knowledge in the DNS. Yours for the right price. :) http://SupersetSolutions.com/
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4E24AD19.20403>