From owner-freebsd-www Sat Mar 15 10:24:23 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id KAA03227 for www-outgoing; Sat, 15 Mar 1997 10:24:23 -0800 (PST) Received: from time.cdrom.com (root@time.cdrom.com [204.216.27.226]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id KAA03160; Sat, 15 Mar 1997 10:23:56 -0800 (PST) Received: from time.cdrom.com (jkh@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by time.cdrom.com (8.8.5/8.6.9) with ESMTP id KAA26333; Sat, 15 Mar 1997 10:24:16 -0800 (PST) To: Eivind Eklund cc: www@freebsd.org Subject: Re: index.html In-reply-to: Your message of "Sat, 15 Mar 1997 19:11:18 +0100." <3.0.32.19970315191117.0171d1e0@dimaga.com> Date: Sat, 15 Mar 1997 10:24:14 -0800 Message-ID: <26329.858450254@time.cdrom.com> From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" Sender: owner-freebsd-www@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk Actually, all that this shows is how much space is being wasted on the page. :-) Using your left alignment for the big index, it's quickly obvious that the banner image could be moved over about half an inch, the quick index moved in under the hot list and the right-edge icons moved left about half an inch or so to line up with the banner graphic. Everything would then be very nicely squared-off looking in about a third less real-estate, but then I don't think that HTML allows you quite that degree of control - "right alignment" seems to mean "all the way over, even if it looks funky" :-) Jordan > > Wouldn't the following small change look better? > > http://maybe.yes.no/perhaps/freebsd_index.html > > > > Eivind Eklund perhaps@yes.no http://maybe.yes.no/perhaps/ eivind@freebsd.org