Date: Mon, 31 May 2010 00:25:40 +0000 (UTC) From: "Bjoern A. Zeeb" <bzeeb-lists@lists.zabbadoz.net> To: Ivan Voras <ivoras@freebsd.org> Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: SUJ and "mount" reporting Message-ID: <20100531002417.R96912@maildrop.int.zabbadoz.net> In-Reply-To: <htutrv$cu$1@dough.gmane.org> References: <alpine.BSF.2.00.1005171616390.1398@desktop> <htutrv$cu$1@dough.gmane.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, 31 May 2010, Ivan Voras wrote: > Shouldn't SU+J be visible in the output of "mount" somehow? I've just enabled > it on a root file system of a machine and while tunefs and dumpfs report both > soft-updates and SUJ are enabled (after reboot), the "mount" command only > shows "soft-updates". Alternative question: how to verify is it active on a > live file system? > > (running CURRENT from a few hours ago, kernel&world synced) As previously stated - this is a hack to do what I think you are asking for: http://people.freebsd.org/~bz/20100309-03-mount.diff Using tunefs, etc. for now would be better. /bz -- Bjoern A. Zeeb I will let you know once I escaped from my bird cage and learnt to fly again. -- Ottawa, ON, Canada, 21st May 2010
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20100531002417.R96912>