From owner-freebsd-hackers Tue Nov 7 15:14:34 1995 Return-Path: owner-hackers Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.6.12/8.6.6) id PAA08250 for hackers-outgoing; Tue, 7 Nov 1995 15:14:34 -0800 Received: from irz301.inf.tu-dresden.de (irz301.inf.tu-dresden.de [141.76.1.11]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.6.12/8.6.6) with ESMTP id PAA08217 for ; Tue, 7 Nov 1995 15:14:08 -0800 Received: from sax.sax.de by irz301.inf.tu-dresden.de (8.6.12/8.6.12-s1) with ESMTP id AAA07548; Wed, 8 Nov 1995 00:13:22 +0100 Received: by sax.sax.de (8.6.11/8.6.12-s1) with UUCP id AAA11079; Wed, 8 Nov 1995 00:13:22 +0100 Received: (from j@localhost) by uriah.heep.sax.de (8.6.12/8.6.9) id AAA24466; Wed, 8 Nov 1995 00:04:09 +0100 From: J Wunsch Message-Id: <199511072304.AAA24466@uriah.heep.sax.de> Subject: Re: What happens to terminal settings on last close? To: grog@lemis.de Date: Wed, 8 Nov 1995 00:04:09 +0100 (MET) Cc: hackers@freebsd.org Reply-To: joerg_wunsch@uriah.heep.sax.de (Joerg Wunsch) In-Reply-To: <199511071326.OAA05257@allegro.lemis.de> from "Greg Lehey" at Nov 7, 95 02:26:21 pm X-Phone: +49-351-2012 669 X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL23] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Length: 555 Sender: owner-hackers@freebsd.org Precedence: bulk As Greg Lehey wrote: > > This is different from the standard BSD behaviour, which leaves the > terminal flags the way they are on the last close, but it's the same > as System V behaviour. Is it intentional or accidental? What do you > think it should do? Read the paragraph about ``initial'' and ``lock'' devices in sio(4). They're mainly a workaround for poor software (like getty(8)). -- cheers, J"org joerg_wunsch@uriah.heep.sax.de -- http://www.sax.de/~joerg/ -- NIC: JW11-RIPE Never trust an operating system you don't have sources for. ;-)