From owner-freebsd-current  Sat Feb  1 13:53:54 1997
Return-Path: <owner-current>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id NAA10981
          for current-outgoing; Sat, 1 Feb 1997 13:53:54 -0800 (PST)
Received: from time.cdrom.com (time.cdrom.com [204.216.27.226])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id NAA10976
          for <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>; Sat, 1 Feb 1997 13:53:52 -0800 (PST)
Received: from time.cdrom.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by time.cdrom.com (8.8.5/8.6.9) with ESMTP id NAA19971; Sat, 1 Feb 1997 13:53:45 -0800 (PST)
To: joerg_wunsch@uriah.heep.sax.de (Joerg Wunsch)
cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org (FreeBSD-current users)
Subject: Re: Good name for a dump(8) option? 
In-reply-to: Your message of "Sat, 01 Feb 1997 18:42:08 +0100."
             <Mutt.19970201184208.j@uriah.heep.sax.de> 
Date: Sat, 01 Feb 1997 13:53:45 -0800
Message-ID: <19967.854834025@time.cdrom.com>
From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@time.cdrom.com>
Sender: owner-current@freebsd.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

> So either we can settle for an option, or i'm not willing to do the
> work.  (Note that i've got these changes ready to commit already, and
> run them locally for quite some time now.  I'm not asking for more
> work. :-)

Well, since you put it that way... :-)

					Jordan