From owner-freebsd-hackers  Wed May 31 11:12:01 1995
Return-Path: hackers-owner
Received: (from majordom@localhost)
          by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) id LAA03906
          for hackers-outgoing; Wed, 31 May 1995 11:12:01 -0700
Received: from trout.sri.MT.net (trout.sri.MT.net [204.182.243.12])
          by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) with ESMTP id LAA03900
          for <hackers@FreeBSD.ORG>; Wed, 31 May 1995 11:11:56 -0700
Received: (from nate@localhost) by trout.sri.MT.net (8.6.11/8.6.11) id MAA12856; Wed, 31 May 1995 12:09:32 -0600
Date: Wed, 31 May 1995 12:09:32 -0600
From: Nate Williams <nate@trout.sri.MT.net>
Message-Id: <199505311809.MAA12856@trout.sri.MT.net>
In-Reply-To: "Jonathan M. Bresler" <jmb@kryten.atinc.com>
       "Re: mailing lists" (May 31,  1:49pm)
X-Mailer: Mail User's Shell (7.2.5 10/14/92)
To: "Jonathan M. Bresler" <jmb@kryten.atinc.com>,
        Tom Samplonius <tom@uniserve.com>
Subject: Re: mailing lists
Cc: hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
Sender: hackers-owner@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk

> >   Zmailer supports multiple simultaneous transport agents.  If you have 
> > the RAM and bandwidth, you can do parallel delivery of hundreds of 
> > messages at once.
> 
> 	Zmailer is a full sendmail replacement.....rather go with a 
> smaller, more directed package that just speeds up delivery.
...

FWIW, our ISP recently switched *from* Zmailer back to sendmail after
they had lots of problems with it.  According to our ISP, Zmailer didn't
support things such as aliases, .forward file, and such w/out alot of
work and in their environment sendmail was much easier to maintain over
the long-term.


Nate