From owner-freebsd-stable Tue Jan 23 6:44:23 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from moon.harmonic.co.il (moon.harmonic.co.il [192.116.140.65]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DEAE437B6A8; Tue, 23 Jan 2001 06:43:41 -0800 (PST) Received: (from nobody@localhost) by moon.harmonic.co.il (8.9.3/8.9.3) id QAA20151; Tue, 23 Jan 2001 16:41:30 +0200 To: Gerald Pfeifer Subject: Re: libgcc_pic is gone (affects Wine port) Message-ID: <980260890.3a6d981aab6ae@webmail.harmonic.co.il> Date: Tue, 23 Jan 2001 16:41:30 +0200 (IST) From: Roman Shterenzon Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG, freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG References: In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit User-Agent: IMP/PHP IMAP webmail program 2.2.2 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Quoting Gerald Pfeifer : > Due to a serious bug in the port of GCC used in the base system > (see ) I and > probably others had to explicitly link against libgcc_pic. > > This bug has been fixed (around 4.2-RELEASE), but also libgcc_pic is > gone now, though I'm not sure whether that is directly related. > > So, what is a "portable" way of compiling sources both on 4.1-RELEASE > and 5.0-CURRENT? On the former I need libgcc_pic, on the latter there > is no libgcc_pic at all. > > Or, as this mainly affects the Wine port, should I just ignore older > versions of FreeBSD? Does 4.2-RELEASE already have the fix to PR 21983? > > Gerald AFAIK, there's no libgcc_* in RELENG_4 anymore as well. Ask David . > > > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message > --Roman Shterenzon, UNIX System Administrator and Consultant [ Xpert UNIX Systems Ltd., Herzlia, Israel. Tel: +972-9-9522361 ] To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message