From owner-freebsd-current  Sat Jul  1 22:55:27 1995
Return-Path: current-owner
Received: (from majordom@localhost)
          by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) id WAA17518
          for current-outgoing; Sat, 1 Jul 1995 22:55:27 -0700
Received: from godzilla.zeta.org.au (godzilla.zeta.org.au [203.2.228.34])
          by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) with ESMTP id WAA17500
          for <current@freebsd.org>; Sat, 1 Jul 1995 22:55:19 -0700
Received: (from bde@localhost) by godzilla.zeta.org.au (8.6.9/8.6.9) id PAA01685; Sun, 2 Jul 1995 15:48:56 +1000
Date: Sun, 2 Jul 1995 15:48:56 +1000
From: Bruce Evans <bde@zeta.org.au>
Message-Id: <199507020548.PAA01685@godzilla.zeta.org.au>
To: peter@haywire.DIALix.COM, rgrimes@gndrsh.aac.dev.com
Subject: Re: when is the supscan done?
Cc: current@freebsd.org
Sender: current-owner@freebsd.org
Precedence: bulk

>Just as a $0.02 suggestion: I wouldn't mind seeing the results of a
>"cvs update -q" (or whatever) when this job is run...  I'd find that a lot 
>easier to read than the output that "sup -v" generates when run on the 
>machine here.  Perhaps others would be interested too?

Use ctm and its output instead of sup.

Bruce