From owner-freebsd-current  Wed Dec 10 18:43:32 1997
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id SAA21273
          for current-outgoing; Wed, 10 Dec 1997 18:43:32 -0800 (PST)
          (envelope-from owner-freebsd-current)
Received: from time.cdrom.com (root@time.cdrom.com [204.216.27.226])
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id SAA21255
          for <freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>; Wed, 10 Dec 1997 18:43:20 -0800 (PST)
          (envelope-from jkh@time.cdrom.com)
Received: from time.cdrom.com (jkh@localhost.cdrom.com [127.0.0.1]) by time.cdrom.com (8.8.7/8.6.9) with ESMTP id SAA24111; Wed, 10 Dec 1997 18:43:15 -0800 (PST)
To: Kevin Day <toasty@home.dragondata.com>
cc: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: 971208 and the nfs rollback didn't fix it... 
In-reply-to: Your message of "Wed, 10 Dec 1997 12:46:39 CST."
             <199712101846.MAA26627@home.dragondata.com> 
Date: Wed, 10 Dec 1997 18:43:15 -0800
Message-ID: <24108.881808195@time.cdrom.com>
From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@time.cdrom.com>
Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

> Does anyone really feel the need to investigate this? I realize userland
> programs should never crash the kernel, but... is this a big enough deal for
> someone to want to investigate?

Yes, I'd say it is.  Is this 2.2.5 or -current, however?

						Jordan