From owner-freebsd-small  Wed Jan 13 19:56:13 1999
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-small@FreeBSD.ORG>
Received: (from majordom@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id TAA10838
          for freebsd-small-outgoing; Wed, 13 Jan 1999 19:56:13 -0800 (PST)
          (envelope-from owner-freebsd-small@FreeBSD.ORG)
Received: from zippy.cdrom.com (zippy.cdrom.com [204.216.27.228])
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id TAA10830;
          Wed, 13 Jan 1999 19:56:12 -0800 (PST)
          (envelope-from jkh@zippy.cdrom.com)
Received: from zippy.cdrom.com (localhost.cdrom.com [127.0.0.1])
	by zippy.cdrom.com (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id TAA91288;
	Wed, 13 Jan 1999 19:54:28 -0800 (PST)
To: chad@DCFinc.com
cc: asmodai@wxs.nl, jkh@FreeBSD.ORG, small@FreeBSD.ORG, abial@nask.pl
Subject: Re: Trinux (+ a proposal) 
In-reply-to: Your message of "Wed, 13 Jan 1999 19:43:40 MST."
             <199901140243.TAA06944@freeway.dcfinc.com> 
Date: Wed, 13 Jan 1999 19:54:28 -0800
Message-ID: <91284.916286068@zippy.cdrom.com>
From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@zippy.cdrom.com>
Sender: owner-freebsd-small@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

> Perhaps you're saying =you're= not sufficient for the task.  Or learning
> a new language would be too much hassle.  Or the user community won't be
> able to deal with it.  Or something.  Those are not language
> sufficiency issues.

True enough, and in deference to both Chad and forth, that's
exactly how I meant it.

- Jordan

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-small" in the body of the message