From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Mar 4 16:04:33 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CDD0E106566B for ; Thu, 4 Mar 2010 16:04:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tbyte@otel.net) Received: from mail.otel.net (unknown [IPv6:2001:630:c2:ff00::89]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8968B8FC21 for ; Thu, 4 Mar 2010 16:04:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: from dragon.otel.net ([212.36.8.135]:55335) by mail.otel.net with esmtp (Exim 4.69 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1NnDXM-0004O5-Ki for freebsd-stable@freebsd.org; Thu, 04 Mar 2010 18:04:32 +0200 From: Iasen Kostov To: freebsd-stable In-Reply-To: <1267716511.43321.3.camel@DraGoN.OTEL.net> References: <1267716511.43321.3.camel@DraGoN.OTEL.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Date: Thu, 04 Mar 2010 18:04:32 +0200 Message-ID: <1267718672.43321.39.camel@DraGoN.OTEL.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.28.2 FreeBSD GNOME Team Port Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: Yes, by ClamAV at mail.otel.net Subject: Re: route -cloning flag X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 04 Mar 2010 16:04:33 -0000 On Thu, 2010-03-04 at 17:28 +0200, Iasen Kostov wrote: > Hi, > > How can I simulate 'route add -net 1.1.1.1/32 -cloning -iface fxp0' on > FreeBSD 8.x because it appears that somebody has axed cloning ? > And no it does NOT work without -cloning. And I don't really want to > argue if it is correct or not - It worked not it doesn't ;) > > Regards, Iasen. > Hum when I actually got to the machine and added the route it worked without -cloning. I can Only guess that the on site support did something wrong but I really don't know what mistake can they make in that simple command (route add -net 1.1.1.1/32 -iface fxp0) ;) . I hope it will still works after reboot ... And the man page is wrong, It still lists -cloning as valid option, with that in mind and remote server one can easily lock himself out :( Regards, Iasen.