From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 16 07:31:12 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2538016A418; Sun, 16 Sep 2007 07:31:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jroberson@chesapeake.net) Received: from webaccess-cl.virtdom.com (webaccess-cl.virtdom.com [216.240.101.25]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC5B913C442; Sun, 16 Sep 2007 07:31:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jroberson@chesapeake.net) Received: from [192.168.1.103] (c-67-160-44-208.hsd1.wa.comcast.net [67.160.44.208]) (authenticated bits=0) by webaccess-cl.virtdom.com (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id l8G7V7lF026836 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-DSS-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Sun, 16 Sep 2007 03:31:10 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from jroberson@chesapeake.net) Date: Sun, 16 Sep 2007 00:34:03 -0700 (PDT) From: Jeff Roberson X-X-Sender: jroberson@10.0.0.1 To: Roman Bogorodskiy In-Reply-To: <20070916071421.GA1320@underworld.novel.ru> Message-ID: <20070916003323.U4507@10.0.0.1> References: <20070916061932.GA93480@underworld.novel.ru> <20070915234855.G531@10.0.0.1> <20070916071421.GA1320@underworld.novel.ru> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: MULTIPART/MIXED; BOUNDARY="0-2052532215-1189928043=:4507" Cc: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: SCHED_ULE on desktop system X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 16 Sep 2007 07:31:12 -0000 This message is in MIME format. The first part should be readable text, while the remaining parts are likely unreadable without MIME-aware tools. --0-2052532215-1189928043=:4507 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed On Sun, 16 Sep 2007, Roman Bogorodskiy wrote: > Jeff Roberson wrote: > >> This is contrary to the experiences of many others. Can you send me your >> dmesg? There may be something about your particular hardware that is >> triggering a bug. ULE is definitely designed to be responsive on the >> desktop. > > Thanks for the quick answer! > > Here's my dmesg: http://people.freebsd.org/~novel/misc/dmesg.txt Roman, The enclosed patch helps things on my system, however, there are still some delays due to IO issues. Let me know if this helps. Thanks, Jeff > > Roman Bogorodskiy > --0-2052532215-1189928043=:4507 Content-Type: TEXT/x-diff; charset=US-ASCII; name=ule.diff Content-Transfer-Encoding: BASE64 Content-ID: <20070916003403.V4507@10.0.0.1> Content-Description: Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=ule.diff SW5kZXg6IHNjaGVkX3VsZS5jDQo9PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09 PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09DQpS Q1MgZmlsZTogL2hvbWUvbmN2cy9zcmMvc3lzL2tlcm4vc2NoZWRfdWxlLmMs dg0KcmV0cmlldmluZyByZXZpc2lvbiAxLjIwNQ0KZGlmZiAtdSAtcjEuMjA1 IHNjaGVkX3VsZS5jDQotLS0gc2NoZWRfdWxlLmMJMjAgQXVnIDIwMDcgMDY6 MzQ6MjAgLTAwMDAJMS4yMDUNCisrKyBzY2hlZF91bGUuYwkxNiBTZXAgMjAw NyAwNzowMjo1MiAtMDAwMA0KQEAgLTM5NCw3ICszOTQsNyBAQA0KIAkJICog VGhpcyBxdWV1ZSBjb250YWlucyBvbmx5IHByaW9yaXRpZXMgYmV0d2VlbiBN SU4gYW5kIE1BWA0KIAkJICogcmVhbHRpbWUuICBVc2UgdGhlIHdob2xlIHF1 ZXVlIHRvIHJlcHJlc2VudCB0aGVzZSB2YWx1ZXMuDQogCQkgKi8NCi0JCWlm ICgoZmxhZ3MgJiAoU1JRX0JPUlJPV0lOR3xTUlFfUFJFRU1QVEVEKSkgPT0g MCkgew0KKwkJaWYgKChmbGFncyAmIFNSUV9CT1JST1dJTkcpID09IDApIHsN CiAJCQlwcmkgPSAocHJpIC0gUFJJX01JTl9USU1FU0hBUkUpIC8gVFNfUlFf UFBROw0KIAkJCXByaSA9IChwcmkgKyB0ZHEtPnRkcV9pZHgpICUgUlFfTlFT Ow0KIAkJCS8qDQo= --0-2052532215-1189928043=:4507--