Date: Sun, 5 Oct 2003 22:28:43 -0700 From: James Jacobsen <james_jacobsen@lycos.co.uk> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: malloc() behavior (was: Pointer please) Message-ID: <20031006052843.GC22536@res241015.resnet.wsu.edu> In-Reply-To: <20031006052042.GA22536@res241015.resnet.wsu.edu> (from james_jacobsen@lycos.co.uk on Sun, Oct 05, 2003 at 22:20:42 -0700) References: <27DDB356-F790-11D7-9174-003065838A88@mulle-kybernetik.com> <20031006030656.GK5283@dan.emsphone.com> <16256.57227.924291.290786@jerusalem.litteratus.org> <20031006033200.GL5283@dan.emsphone.com> <20031006042751.GA85685@res241015.resnet.wsu.edu> <16256.62127.618353.861297@jerusalem.litteratus.org> <20031006052042.GA22536@res241015.resnet.wsu.edu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Man, I need to learn to spell. :) --James On 10/05/03 22:20:42, James Jacobsen wrote: > What's really bad, is that freebsd could potentally change there > behavor down the line. Its probably dictated by the way kernel > dezined, meaning they may do whats the cheapist. I would. If they > do its go to lead to some weird behavior. :-) > > --James > > On 10/05/03 21:42:23, Robert Huff wrote: >> >> James Jacobsen writes: >> >> > It does not matter what freebsd does, C does not require that >> > malloc initialize space according to Kernighan and Ritchie. >> >> I knew that, and agree depending on a particular behavior is >> bad programming practice. That said, there's a lot of "bad >> programmers" out there .... >> >> >> Robert Huff >> >> >> >> > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions- > unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20031006052843.GC22536>