From owner-freebsd-current  Thu Sep 14 05:01:56 1995
Return-Path: current-owner
Received: (from majordom@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.6.12/8.6.6) id FAA07511
          for current-outgoing; Thu, 14 Sep 1995 05:01:56 -0700
Received: from silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU (silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU [136.152.64.181])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.6.12/8.6.6) with ESMTP id FAA07503
          for <current@freefall.freebsd.org>; Thu, 14 Sep 1995 05:01:54 -0700
Received: (from asami@localhost) by silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU (8.6.12/8.6.9) id FAA27059; Thu, 14 Sep 1995 05:02:08 -0700
Date: Thu, 14 Sep 1995 05:02:08 -0700
Message-Id: <199509141202.FAA27059@silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU>
To: faulkner@mpd.tandem.com
CC: paul@FreeBSD.org, jkh@time.cdrom.com, current@freefall.freebsd.org
In-reply-to: <9509131935.AA08745@olympus> (faulkner@mpd.tandem.com)
Subject: Re: libforms - thumbs up or down?
From: asami@cs.berkeley.edu (Satoshi Asami)
Sender: current-owner@FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

 * From: faulkner@mpd.tandem.com (Boyd Faulkner)

 * Would it be retired to the ports?  Then it would be available if
 * anyone wanted it.

Don't mean to nit-pick, but if it's broken or not used at all, it's
not welcome in ports either.  The ports tree is not a retirement
home for old source. :)

If someone really wants it, and someone (doesn't have to be the same
"someone") is committed to make sure it is going to work now and in
the future, that's fine, of course.

Satoshi