From owner-freebsd-stable Tue Nov 7 9:24:58 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from whistle.com (s205m131.whistle.com [207.76.205.131]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB6DA37B4CF for ; Tue, 7 Nov 2000 09:24:56 -0800 (PST) Received: (from smap@localhost) by whistle.com (8.10.0/8.10.0) id eA7HONc09045; Tue, 7 Nov 2000 09:24:23 -0800 (PST) Received: from pau-amma.whistle.com( 207.76.205.64) by whistle.com via smap (V2.0) id xma009041; Tue, 7 Nov 2000 09:24:22 -0800 Received: (from dhw@localhost) by pau-amma.whistle.com (8.11.1/8.11.1) id eA7HOML20558; Tue, 7 Nov 2000 09:24:22 -0800 (PST) Date: Tue, 7 Nov 2000 09:24:22 -0800 (PST) From: David Wolfskill Message-Id: <200011071724.eA7HOML20558@pau-amma.whistle.com> To: jdp@polstra.com, stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Is sockstat broken in -stable? In-Reply-To: Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG >Date: Tue, 07 Nov 2000 09:18:01 -0800 (PST) >From: John Polstra >On a -stable system from October 31, I'm seeing this from sockstat: >alpha$ sockstat >USER COMMAND PID FD PROTO LOCAL ADDRESS FOREIGN ADDRESS >root sshd 13195 5 ? ? ? >root sshd 13160 5 ? ? ? >... >Userland and kernel are in sync. This is on an Alpha, though I >don't know whether that's significant or not. Is anybody else >seeing this problem? I am not seeing the problem, either on 4.1.1-S from near 29 September, nor from 4.2-BETA from 03 November (both Intel platforms). Cheers, david -- David Wolfskill dhw@whistle.com UNIX System Administrator Desk: 650/577-7158 TIE: 8/499-7158 Cell: 650/759-0823 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message