From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jun 3 01:40:44 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7608A16A469 for ; Sat, 3 Jun 2006 01:40:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from zbeeble@gmail.com) Received: from nf-out-0910.google.com (nf-out-0910.google.com [64.233.182.184]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4023543D58 for ; Sat, 3 Jun 2006 01:40:38 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from zbeeble@gmail.com) Received: by nf-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id l37so1225171nfc for ; Fri, 02 Jun 2006 18:40:37 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=CNb5UDEtR9C4axp5k9Vr6X4igZkJaEHtPzEDApMTuIXIRIm7wOJovDK0OENJ+JIQak3Vo3/UQ42HGNcdv8PV4muJ4+mUUgrUb04lHBFIN9K90TMzRhm7fzn4xEDCKMG2Bmi7VKIioFJIxLAFDq/uHj4p5WIwYvFwSkqM4FDggec= Received: by 10.48.242.14 with SMTP id p14mr535173nfh; Wed, 31 May 2006 09:53:51 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.67.25.10 with HTTP; Wed, 31 May 2006 09:53:51 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <5f67a8c40605310953h27bf170oa474200cd4b93c03@mail.gmail.com> Date: Wed, 31 May 2006 12:53:51 -0400 From: "Zaphod Beeblebrox" To: "Eugene M. Kim" In-Reply-To: <447DBA44.1060605@ab.ote.we.lv> MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <447DB0B1.8040206@ab.ote.we.lv> <20060531153029.GE6982@dan.emsphone.com> <447DBA44.1060605@ab.ote.we.lv> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org, Dan Nelson Subject: Re: dump(8) performance X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 03 Jun 2006 01:40:48 -0000 On 5/31/06, Eugene M. Kim wrote: > > Dan Nelson wrote: > > Are you using the -C option to dump? I would expact that to help more > > in the "dumping directories" step, but it might help later phases too. > > Yep, -C32. I'm a pretty big fan of using team (ports/misc/team). Team implements a ring buffer for the output of dump. Is the -C argument an output buffer or a buffer at some other level of the process?