From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Feb 6 13:02:44 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 74581147 for ; Wed, 6 Feb 2013 13:02:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from hskuhra@eumx.net) Received: from eumx.net (eumx.net [91.82.101.43]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 26F56887 for ; Wed, 6 Feb 2013 13:02:43 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=eumx.net; h=mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:date:from:to:subject :in-reply-to:references:message-id; s=default; bh=EFN4GQaxXrS3+S dMU2KAmTCm24Y=; b=ZFk3FaxLDzaD+UzdARIyZ4k3wgblkZSgA9N2basz0fW4z5 VFl2LAmGeQo+TB/8ftw9rQPhWbXvLaEcipIdV6aHBOzHi/9pOWhuejCPCnymoamZ vbQP6EMLREHXMTsmlge+8bM89b5XkjkUtdPNsma8NXtFGYEZmygoWTRmENBAE= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=eumx.net; h=mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:date:from:to:subject :in-reply-to:references:message-id; q=dns; s=default; b=x6ZyTbuW zGnW/R+MJClh8khR+0WOhGyvIZ01fpybBTHpX1gg9XO2rUSDbjUQdNzc8X9wMU5J d38Xtd51wOzwZjR1/A+e1tk7QNfhmgFh+sEsYdL/PcJ2Dva958J2L5rQl3u8IMHG +M9VnKei7Bu8WjGuIX3YQMlJxG7HgZMIUq0= MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Wed, 06 Feb 2013 14:02:42 +0100 From: "Herbert J. Skuhra" To: Subject: Re: why is bacula-client looking for libz.so.5 on 9-STABLE In-Reply-To: <51118FCF.90102@intersonic.se> References: <51118FCF.90102@intersonic.se> Message-ID: <9d89b5cd3c4f027cfdb5d95748918421@eumx.net> X-Sender: hskuhra@eumx.net User-Agent: Roundcube Webmail X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 06 Feb 2013 13:02:44 -0000 Den 06.02.2013 00:03, skrev Per olof Ljungmark: > Hi, > > Upgraded a system from 8.3 to 9-STABLE and did make delete-old-libs > afterwards. System has around thirty ports installed and all except > bacula-client upgraded gracefully. > > Why does it want libz.so.5 when libz.so.6 is present? I'm pretty sure > I'm missing the obvious here... > > > > Linking bacula-fd ... > /usr/ports/sysutils/bacula-client/work/bacula-5.2.12/libtool --silent > --tag=CXX --mode=link /usr/bin/c++ -L/usr/local/lib -L../lib > -L../findlib -o bacula-fd filed.o authenticate.o acl.o backup.o > estimate.o fd_plugins.o accurate.o filed_conf.o heartbeat.o job.o > pythonfd.o restore.o status.o verify.o verify_vol.o xattr.o -lz > -lbacfind -lbacpy -lbaccfg -lbac -lm -lpthread -lintl -lwrap > /usr/local/lib/libintl.so /usr/local/lib/libiconv.so -Wl,-rpath > -Wl,/usr/local/lib > /usr/bin/ld: warning: libz.so.5, needed by /usr/local/lib/libbac.so, > not > found (try using -rpath or -rpath-link) 'libbac.so' is installed by bacula-server; try to rebuild this port first! Use 'sysutils/libchk' or pkg_libchk (from bsdadminscripts) to find other broken ports. -- Herbert