From owner-freebsd-hackers Tue Nov 5 19:28:21 1996 Return-Path: owner-hackers Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id TAA11748 for hackers-outgoing; Tue, 5 Nov 1996 19:28:21 -0800 (PST) Received: from panda.hilink.com.au (panda.hilink.com.au [203.2.144.5]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id TAA11715 for ; Tue, 5 Nov 1996 19:27:42 -0800 (PST) Received: (from danny@localhost) by panda.hilink.com.au (8.7.6/8.7.3) id OAA05852; Wed, 6 Nov 1996 14:26:10 +1100 (EST) Date: Wed, 6 Nov 1996 14:26:08 +1100 (EST) From: "Daniel O'Callaghan" To: Robin Cutshaw cc: Bill Fenner , Gavin Cameron , freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ZNYX346 and FreeBSD 2.1.5 and the latest SNAP (fwd) In-Reply-To: <199611060240.VAA29283@intercore.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-hackers@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk On Tue, 5 Nov 1996, Robin Cutshaw wrote: > Bill Fenner writes: > > Look in sys/pci/if_de.c; there is some kludgery there to handle the > > ZNYX 21040 multiport cards. It's worth trying to duplicate the 21040 > > special-case code and seeing if it can handle the 21140 ZNYX; it looks > > fairly straightforward. > > I've got the cogent equivalent of this card (which is now from adaptec). > This card get the same error reports. I've looked through the srom data > that's there and I haven't quite figured out how to uniquely identify > the card. The card doesn't seem to follow its 21040 equivalent in > programming design. Matt is currently working on the 21140 cards (Znyx346), but the Znyx314 (10base-T only) definitely do work, reported by Joe Greco. Danny