From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Mar 1 16:53:03 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D9229106566B; Thu, 1 Mar 2012 16:53:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jhb@freebsd.org) Received: from cyrus.watson.org (cyrus.watson.org [65.122.17.42]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AAA028FC19; Thu, 1 Mar 2012 16:53:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bigwig.baldwin.cx (bigwig.baldwin.cx [96.47.65.170]) by cyrus.watson.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 5F39646B32; Thu, 1 Mar 2012 11:53:03 -0500 (EST) Received: from jhbbsd.localnet (unknown [209.249.190.124]) by bigwig.baldwin.cx (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id BD1FCB996; Thu, 1 Mar 2012 11:53:02 -0500 (EST) From: John Baldwin To: Andriy Gapon Date: Thu, 1 Mar 2012 09:35:27 -0500 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.5 (FreeBSD/8.2-CBSD-20110714-p10; KDE/4.5.5; amd64; ; ) References: <4F26CC5A.2070501@FreeBSD.org> <4F4F35B9.5090308@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <4F4F35B9.5090308@FreeBSD.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201203010935.27169.jhb@freebsd.org> X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.7 (bigwig.baldwin.cx); Thu, 01 Mar 2012 11:53:02 -0500 (EST) Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org, Devin Teske , Devin Teske Subject: Re: revisiting tunables under Safe Mode menu option X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 01 Mar 2012 16:53:03 -0000 On Thursday, March 01, 2012 3:39:21 am Andriy Gapon wrote: > on 01/03/2012 03:34 Devin Teske said the following: > > > > +1 on keeping the menu items loosely entwined (ACPI stands alone, but Safe > > Mode knows about ACPI but only acts on it when being enabled). > > Can you explain why? > +1 for having both menu items and each doing its own thing without any > entanglement :-) Yeah, I think at this point we could make safe mode not disable ACPI, but leave those as independent knobs. That's simpler to implement and arguably more intuitive (though having the boot menu now have 'YES/NO' state that gets updated helps a lot with the UI being easier to understand). -- John Baldwin