From owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Feb 3 06:20:01 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-bugs@smarthost.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [8.8.178.115]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA9A6E0D for ; Sun, 3 Feb 2013 06:20:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206c::16:87]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A461A8BB for ; Sun, 3 Feb 2013 06:20:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.6/8.14.6) with ESMTP id r136K0Ui022593 for ; Sun, 3 Feb 2013 06:20:00 GMT (envelope-from gnats@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.6/8.14.6/Submit) id r136K0LH022589; Sun, 3 Feb 2013 06:20:00 GMT (envelope-from gnats) Date: Sun, 3 Feb 2013 06:20:00 GMT Message-Id: <201302030620.r136K0LH022589@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org Cc: From: Eitan Adler Subject: Re: kern/175674: sem_open() should use O_EXLOCK with open() instead of a separate flock() call X-BeenThere: freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list Reply-To: Eitan Adler List-Id: Bug reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 03 Feb 2013 06:20:01 -0000 The following reply was made to PR kern/175674; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Eitan Adler To: Giorgos Keramidas Cc: freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org, bug-followup Subject: Re: kern/175674: sem_open() should use O_EXLOCK with open() instead of a separate flock() call Date: Sun, 3 Feb 2013 01:18:17 -0500 On 3 February 2013 00:30, Giorgos Keramidas wrote: > Jilles and David, do you think this patch looks ok for libc? Why bother keeping the contents of the #if 0? Remove it. Then it looks good to me. -- Eitan Adler