From owner-cvs-all Mon Jan 22 22:56: 8 2001 Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.21]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DAF1B37B400; Mon, 22 Jan 2001 22:55:47 -0800 (PST) Received: (from andreas@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.11.1/8.11.1) id f0N6tlP72582; Mon, 22 Jan 2001 22:55:47 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from andreas) Message-Id: <200101230655.f0N6tlP72582@freefall.freebsd.org> From: Andreas Klemm Date: Mon, 22 Jan 2001 22:55:47 -0800 (PST) To: cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: cvs commit: ports/net/zebra Makefile X-FreeBSD-CVS-Branch: HEAD Sender: owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG andreas 2001/01/22 22:55:47 PST Modified files: net/zebra Makefile Log: unbreak port. note: I tried to build a portname applying to the porters handbook conventions. Unfortunately it doesn't have a good example for version numbers like 0.90a. 0.90-alpha would have to be change to 0.90.a. So I thought it should be done this way for 0.90.a as well. But then you have to set DISTFILES and WRKSRC (the latter I forgot in a last minute change, sorry, which broke the port). And even if you get the port running again, then portlint tells you pretty things how to do it better ... All in all. It would be fine to add an example in porters handbook for cases like 0.90a, which should *not* be changed to 0.90.a ! Submitted by: Josef Karthauser Revision Changes Path 1.48 +2 -3 ports/net/zebra/Makefile To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message