From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Mar 11 18:34:14 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0E7D71065707 for ; Tue, 11 Mar 2008 18:34:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wearabnet@yahoo.ca) Received: from web33703.mail.mud.yahoo.com (web33703.mail.mud.yahoo.com [68.142.201.200]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D31E98FC2D for ; Tue, 11 Mar 2008 18:34:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wearabnet@yahoo.ca) Received: (qmail 27950 invoked by uid 60001); 11 Mar 2008 18:34:13 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.ca; h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Subject:To:Cc:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Message-ID; b=KdeG3ZeoTuISccY/vLbHaH8Y0wOBRt2UKqGiqwRD6dLcFb3b/3izzEjS+I9+EMYY/QywwcBCIQW06uOkM5aQPDPZeMna2r7aZbT45qk5HCoHAY3eUg8hC+QP1gatihd/rH70g151g5RXighUmjdG5MCSMD+moJxyMaZHhrvw3qs=; X-YMail-OSG: 3AqiOOgVM1ncO5n5urJhtW1nyNb7PhskQbDucr5ALkoUVtXvmTSooz.gN144dCRUoCi.I3W54MKNM3xd23T8UpV0FbsmduTslV2wMqoZWdnw42k- Received: from [82.148.96.69] by web33703.mail.mud.yahoo.com via HTTP; Tue, 11 Mar 2008 11:34:12 PDT X-Mailer: YahooMailRC/902.35 YahooMailWebService/0.7.162 Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2008 11:34:12 -0700 (PDT) From: Abdullah Ibn Hamad Al-Marri To: pyunyh@gmail.com, Daniel Gerzo MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Message-ID: <113159.27619.qm@web33703.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Cc: FreeBSD CURRENT Subject: Re: re(4) problem X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2008 18:34:14 -0000 ----- Original Message ---- > From: Pyun YongHyeon > To: Daniel Gerzo > Cc: current@FreeBSD.org; yongari@FreeBSD.org > Sent: Tuesday, March 11, 2008 5:24:41 AM > Subject: Re: re(4) problem > > On Mon, Mar 10, 2008 at 09:38:32PM +0100, Daniel Gerzo wrote: > > Hello Daniel, > > > > Monday, March 10, 2008, 4:26:49 PM, you wrote: > > > > > Hello Pyun, > > > > >> Since you're using MSI, would you try attached patch? > > >> Sorry, I don't have PCIe based hardware and RealTek's datasheet for > > >> PCIe variants is too poor to get useful information. > > >> > > >> -- > > >> Regards, > > >> Pyun YongHyeon > > > > > Thank you for your quick reply, I will test your patch ASAP, but I have one > > > simple question: > > > > > Should I apply this patch on top of > > > http://people.freebsd.org/~yongari/re/re.HEAD.patch > > > or what is this patch aginst? > > > > > Thank you. > > > > Or better, please send me (or place somewhere on your home page) the > > complete if_re.c and if_rlreg.h which should adress my problems, so > > that I can test it easily. > > > > Done. > http://people.freebsd.org/~yongari/re/if_re.c > http://people.freebsd.org/~yongari/re/if_rlreg.h > The above files would build on CURRENT/RELENG_7/7.0-RELEASE. > > I'm not sure whether it helps or not. > > > Your efforst are greatly appreciated! > > > > -- > > Best regards, > > Daniel mailto:danger@FreeBSD.org > > > > -- > Regards, > Pyun YongHyeon Ok, here is the ping to 2 servers using same nic to another server using fxp in same lan. ping -c 100 -s 5000 after using http://people.freebsd.org/~yongari/re/if_re.c http://people.freebsd.org/~yongari/re/if_rlreg.h re0: port 0xc000-0xc0ff mem 0xd0020000-0xd0020fff irq 17 at device 0.0 on pci3 re0: Using 2 MSI messages miibus0: on re0 rgephy0: PHY 1 on miibus0 rgephy0: 10baseT, 10baseT-FDX, 100baseTX, 100baseTX-FDX, 1000baseT, 1000baseT-FDX, auto re0: Ethernet address: 00:19:d1:a7:a4:72 re0: [FILTER] re0: [FILTER] 100 packets transmitted, 100 packets received, 0.0% packet loss round-trip min/avg/max/stddev = 2.410/2.429/2.587/0.019 ms Here without. re0: port 0xd000-0xd0ff mem 0xf2000000-0xf2000fff irq 17 at device 0.0 on pci3 re0: Using 2 MSI messages miibus0: on re0 rgephy0: PHY 1 on miibus0 rgephy0: 10baseT, 10baseT-FDX, 100baseTX, 100baseTX-FDX, 1000baseT, 1000baseT-FDX, auto re0: Ethernet address: 00:1a:4d:4f:76:07 re0: [FILTER] re0: [FILTER] 100 packets transmitted, 99 packets received, 1.0% packet loss round-trip min/avg/max/stddev = 632.148/633.103/640.812/0.872 ms So as I could tell the ping latency got fixed by using latest changes. -- Regards, -Abdullah Ibn Hamad Al-Marri Arab Portal http://www.WeArab.Net/ ____________________________________________________________________________________ Looking for last minute shopping deals? Find them fast with Yahoo! Search. http://tools.search.yahoo.com/newsearch/category.php?category=shopping