From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Feb 22 01:29:44 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 89F9116A420 for ; Wed, 22 Feb 2006 01:29:44 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from joao@matik.com.br) Received: from msrv.matik.com.br (msrv.matik.com.br [200.152.83.14]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E6BA843D45 for ; Wed, 22 Feb 2006 01:29:43 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from joao@matik.com.br) Received: from anb (anb.matik.com.br [200.152.83.34]) by msrv.matik.com.br (8.13.4/8.13.1) with ESMTP id k1M1TW1I030505; Tue, 21 Feb 2006 22:29:33 -0300 (BRT) (envelope-from joao@matik.com.br) From: JoaoBR To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Date: Tue, 21 Feb 2006 22:29:23 -0300 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.1 References: <200602210719.15683.joao@matik.com.br> <43FB4905.2000506@errno.com> <43FB5246.2070608@errno.com> In-Reply-To: <43FB5246.2070608@errno.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200602212229.24775.joao@matik.com.br> X-Filter-Version: 1.11a (msrv.matik.com.br) X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV version 0.88, clamav-milter version 0.87 on msrv.matik.com.br X-Virus-Status: Clean Cc: Martin Subject: Re: hostap with atheros unusable on releng_6? X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 22 Feb 2006 01:29:44 -0000 On Tuesday 21 February 2006 14:47, Sam Leffler wrote: > > I've got a ton of changes coming in from HEAD soon (don't recall what > > the mfc date is). =A0These include a fix to deal with a race whereby tx > > descriptors could be "lost" under heavy load. =A0This could explain the > > slowdown in operation but not the timeouts. =A0If you can test with HEAD > > that would be good; otherwise you'll need to wait for the mfc's. > > Actually it might explain the timeouts though I think it's unlikely. > Regardless try HEAD or wait. talking to yourself is where it starts ... ( just kidding ; I got it) I am not sure if using head would be an option for me, my option is releng_= 5=20 so long because it works fine as hostap on ath anyway I am not sure what you mean by losing tx descriptors and I am also n= ot=20 so sure if this is related to the problem I see because the problem appears= =20 with no traffic at all after some time I read some docs from head and I didn't find something describing the probl= em=20 I have Jo=E3o A mensagem foi scaneada pelo sistema de e-mail e pode ser considerada segura. Service fornecido pelo Datacenter Matik https://datacenter.matik.com.br