From owner-freebsd-current Sun Aug 22 10:27: 5 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from po4.wam.umd.edu (po4.wam.umd.edu [128.8.10.166]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF40D155E0 for ; Sun, 22 Aug 1999 10:26:56 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from culverk@wam.umd.edu) Received: from rac1.wam.umd.edu (root@rac1.wam.umd.edu [128.8.10.141]) by po4.wam.umd.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id NAA06850 for ; Sun, 22 Aug 1999 13:25:15 -0400 (EDT) Received: from rac1.wam.umd.edu (sendmail@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by rac1.wam.umd.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id NAA10752 for ; Sun, 22 Aug 1999 13:25:15 -0400 (EDT) Received: from localhost (culverk@localhost) by rac1.wam.umd.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id NAA10748 for ; Sun, 22 Aug 1999 13:25:15 -0400 (EDT) X-Authentication-Warning: rac1.wam.umd.edu: culverk owned process doing -bs Date: Sun, 22 Aug 1999 13:25:15 -0400 (EDT) From: Kenneth Wayne Culver To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: gcc back? Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG I'm just wondering but I noticed when I cvsupped a few minutes ago that gcc is back in the source tree. I was wondering if there were plans to keep gcc in the source now. Kenneth Culver To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message