From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Oct 25 13:12:47 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B87E416A4C0; Sat, 25 Oct 2003 13:12:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: from gauss.stokely.org (builder.freebsdmall.com [65.86.180.18]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B5FAB43FE3; Sat, 25 Oct 2003 13:12:45 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from murray@gauss.stokely.org) Received: from gauss.stokely.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by gauss.stokely.org (8.12.10/8.12.9) with ESMTP id h9PKCjYm017973; Sat, 25 Oct 2003 13:12:45 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from murray@gauss.stokely.org) Received: (from murray@localhost) by gauss.stokely.org (8.12.10/8.12.9/Submit) id h9PKCjX3017972; Sat, 25 Oct 2003 13:12:45 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sat, 25 Oct 2003 13:12:45 -0700 From: Murray Stokely To: Mike Harding Message-ID: <20031025201245.GD17410@freebsdmall.com> References: <20031023141503.4004C53C7@netcom1.netcom.com> <20031023092157.M79600@carver.gumbysoft.com> <1066927591.724.8.camel@netcom1.netcom.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1066927591.724.8.camel@netcom1.netcom.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i X-GPG-Key-ID: 1024D/0E451F7D X-GPG-Key-Fingerprint: E2CA 411D DD44 53FD BB4B 3CB5 B4D7 10A2 0E45 1F7D cc: stable@FreeBSD.org cc: sos@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Possible mouse/ATA problems in -STABLE X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 25 Oct 2003 20:12:47 -0000 On Thu, Oct 23, 2003 at 09:46:31AM -0700, Mike Harding wrote: > I think that maybe the new ATA drivers are staying in the interrupt a > bit longer and causing data to be dropped. > > I have reverted to 1-sep -STABLE and it seems stable (so far), I am > going to try a new -STABLE and look at the interrupt counts. > > The -STABLE ATA drivers were MFC'd - after this merge I see the > following comment for a commit on ata-dma.c (revision 1.122) > > ... > "This pushed the time spent between starting the ATA command and > starting the DMA engine over the hill for some controllers > (especially the Silicon Image DS3112a) and caused what looked > like lost interrupts." > > - so possibly we need another MFC... ? I think maybe we do. Unfortunately Soeren is not working on ATA in -stable. Is there anyone else (a committer?) who can verify that this analysis is correct? Can we circulate a patch? - Murray