From owner-freebsd-hackers Wed Jun 30 12: 9:10 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from jade.chc-chimes.com (jade.chc-chimes.com [206.67.97.83]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8F75A14FE3 for ; Wed, 30 Jun 1999 12:09:02 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from billf@jade.chc-chimes.com) Received: from localhost (billf@localhost) by jade.chc-chimes.com (8.8.8/8.8.8) with SMTP id PAA09545; Wed, 30 Jun 1999 15:13:17 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from billf@jade.chc-chimes.com) Date: Wed, 30 Jun 1999 15:13:17 -0400 (EDT) From: Bill Fumerola To: Dag-Erling Smorgrav Cc: hackers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: tcpdump(1) additions. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On 30 Jun 1999, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote: > Bill Fumerola writes: > > Unless there is strong feelings against it, I'd like to commit the smb > > patches (as seen on www.samba.org) and ipsec/ike patches (recently mailed > > to the tcpdump mailing list and bugs@FreeBSD.org) to tcpdump(1). > > Will they be included in a future official release of tcpdump? Can we > afford to wait until then, and simply merge in the next release when > it comes? I thought of that, and I believe Julian said that patches sent to the tcpdump mailing list seem to never get into the distribution or something to that effect. Correct me if I'm wrong. - bill fumerola - billf@chc-chimes.com - BF1560 - computer horizons corp - - ph:(800) 252-2421 - bfumerol@computerhorizons.com - billf@FreeBSD.org - To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message