From owner-freebsd-questions Fri May 21 7:49:12 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from pantheon-po04.its.yale.edu (pantheon-po04.its.yale.edu [130.132.143.35]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B82914D39 for ; Fri, 21 May 1999 07:49:09 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from denis.ostrovsky@yale.edu) Received: from mercury.cis.yale.edu (do33@mercury.cis.yale.edu [130.132.143.247]) by pantheon-po04.its.yale.edu (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id KAA15288 for ; Fri, 21 May 1999 10:49:07 -0400 (EDT) Received: from localhost (do33@localhost) by mercury.cis.yale.edu (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id KAA28595 for ; Fri, 21 May 1999 10:49:06 -0400 (EDT) X-Authentication-Warning: mercury.cis.yale.edu: do33 owned process doing -bs Date: Fri, 21 May 1999 10:49:06 -0400 (EDT) From: Dennis Ostrovsky X-Sender: do33@mercury.cis.yale.edu To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: egcs.... In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Fri, 21 May 1999, Bill Woods wrote: > I was toying with the idea of using the egcs in the ports (1.1.2 I > believe) on my 3.2 system. Anyone useing egcs for everyday compiliong and > anyone compiled the kernel with it. What are your observations? > problems...and is it just a bad idea or does it work well. I was under the impression that egcs would not compile the kernel properly under 3.x, although it does work (I think) for the 4.0-CURRENT tree. Dennis ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Dennis Ostrovsky ** Department of Chemistry ** Yale University E-mail: den@master.chem.yale.edu WWW: http://pantheon.yale.edu/~do33 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message