From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG  Tue Mar 30 02:31:22 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 78FDA16A4CE
	for <current@freebsd.org>; Tue, 30 Mar 2004 02:31:22 -0800 (PST)
Received: from nagual.pp.ru (pobrecita.freebsd.ru [194.87.13.42])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC63143D2D
	for <current@freebsd.org>; Tue, 30 Mar 2004 02:31:21 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from ache@pobrecita.freebsd.ru)
Received: from pobrecita.freebsd.ru (ache@localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by nagual.pp.ru (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i2UAVJqE047619;
	Tue, 30 Mar 2004 14:31:19 +0400 (MSD)
	(envelope-from ache@pobrecita.freebsd.ru)
Received: (from ache@localhost)
	by pobrecita.freebsd.ru (8.12.11/8.12.11/Submit) id i2UAVJBD047618;
	Tue, 30 Mar 2004 14:31:19 +0400 (MSD)
	(envelope-from ache)
Date: Tue, 30 Mar 2004 14:31:19 +0400
From: Andrey Chernov <ache@nagual.pp.ru>
To: Dag-Erling Sm?rgrav <des@des.no>
Message-ID: <20040330103119.GA47518@nagual.pp.ru>
Mail-Followup-To: Andrey Chernov <ache@nagual.pp.ru>,
	Dag-Erling Sm?rgrav <des@des.no>, current@freebsd.org
References: <20040328182314.GA99956@nagual.pp.ru> <xzpisgmwurw.fsf@dwp.des.no>
	<20040330093548.GA46139@nagual.pp.ru> <xzpvfkmvdew.fsf@dwp.des.no>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <xzpvfkmvdew.fsf@dwp.des.no>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i
X-AntiVirus: checked by AntiVir Milter 1.1-beta; AVE 6.24.0.7; VDF 6.24.0.75
	     (host: pobrecita.freebsd.ru)
cc: current@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: mtree -L is broken due to unneded type=link additions to
	BSD.*.dist
X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current
	<freebsd-current.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 30 Mar 2004 10:31:22 -0000

On Tue, Mar 30, 2004 at 12:26:31PM +0200, Dag-Erling Sm?rgrav wrote:
> Andrey Chernov <ache@nagual.pp.ru> writes:
> > This problem already fixed long time ago in /usr/ports/Mk/bsd.port.mk:
> 
> On the contrary.  The problem is that if you compare a file listing
> before and after installing the port, the symlinks will show up in the
> "after" list.

I am not sure I understand situation you describe. As I see, there is a
step in bsd.port.mk when directories are created (and symlinks we discuss
too, just few lines later). Even with your patch, they will be created in
exact the same place in bsd.port.mk - i.e. I see no difference in
before/after installing the port situation with your patch or without it.
Please explain the difference.

-- 
Andrey Chernov | http://ache.pp.ru/