Date: Tue, 30 Mar 2004 14:31:19 +0400 From: Andrey Chernov <ache@nagual.pp.ru> To: Dag-Erling Sm?rgrav <des@des.no> Cc: current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: mtree -L is broken due to unneded type=link additions to BSD.*.dist Message-ID: <20040330103119.GA47518@nagual.pp.ru> In-Reply-To: <xzpvfkmvdew.fsf@dwp.des.no> References: <20040328182314.GA99956@nagual.pp.ru> <xzpisgmwurw.fsf@dwp.des.no> <20040330093548.GA46139@nagual.pp.ru> <xzpvfkmvdew.fsf@dwp.des.no>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, Mar 30, 2004 at 12:26:31PM +0200, Dag-Erling Sm?rgrav wrote: > Andrey Chernov <ache@nagual.pp.ru> writes: > > This problem already fixed long time ago in /usr/ports/Mk/bsd.port.mk: > > On the contrary. The problem is that if you compare a file listing > before and after installing the port, the symlinks will show up in the > "after" list. I am not sure I understand situation you describe. As I see, there is a step in bsd.port.mk when directories are created (and symlinks we discuss too, just few lines later). Even with your patch, they will be created in exact the same place in bsd.port.mk - i.e. I see no difference in before/after installing the port situation with your patch or without it. Please explain the difference. -- Andrey Chernov | http://ache.pp.ru/
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040330103119.GA47518>