From owner-cvs-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Oct 20 17:40:39 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CFFB810656F6; Mon, 20 Oct 2008 17:40:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sobomax@FreeBSD.org) Received: from sippysoft.com (gk1.360sip.com [72.236.70.240]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 95E888FC08; Mon, 20 Oct 2008 17:40:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sobomax@FreeBSD.org) Received: from [192.168.1.91] (S010600132053396e.vc.shawcable.net [24.87.32.150] (may be forged)) (authenticated bits=0) by sippysoft.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m9KHBYgi035732 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Mon, 20 Oct 2008 10:11:35 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from sobomax@FreeBSD.org) Message-ID: <48FCBBC5.4070603@FreeBSD.org> Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2008 10:11:33 -0700 From: Maxim Sobolev Organization: Sippy Software, Inc. User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.17 (Windows/20080914) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Jeremy Chadwick References: <200810201626.m9KGQFZx016617@repoman.freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <200810201626.m9KGQFZx016617@repoman.freebsd.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=KOI8-U; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org, ports-committers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/net/asterisk Makefile ports/net/asterisk/files patch-main-utils.c patch-main::utils.c X-BeenThere: cvs-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: CVS commit messages for the ports tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2008 17:40:39 -0000 Jeremy Chadwick wrote: > koitsu 2008-10-20 16:26:15 UTC > > FreeBSD ports repository > > Modified files: > net/asterisk Makefile > Added files: > net/asterisk/files patch-main-utils.c > Removed files: > net/asterisk/files patch-main::utils.c > Log: > - Follow present-day naming scheme of files/ patches > - Increase PORTREVISION Jeremy, If you have not noticed there is an active maintainer for this port. I would appreciate if you run all your changes through him. This patch should have been submitted to the Digium bug tracking system. -Maxim