From owner-freebsd-current Wed Jun 28 1:48:24 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.FreeBSD.ORG [204.216.27.21]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB69F37B8EB; Wed, 28 Jun 2000 01:48:22 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from kris@FreeBSD.org) Received: from localhost (kris@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.9.3/8.9.2) with ESMTP id BAA58953; Wed, 28 Jun 2000 01:48:22 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from kris@FreeBSD.org) X-Authentication-Warning: freefall.freebsd.org: kris owned process doing -bs Date: Wed, 28 Jun 2000 01:48:22 -0700 (PDT) From: Kris Kennaway To: Warner Losh Cc: Assar Westerlund , current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: vnode_if.h: how should it be done ? In-Reply-To: <200006250736.BAA09723@harmony.village.org> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Sun, 25 Jun 2000, Warner Losh wrote: > They aren't installed. You must have a kernel tree to build the kld. > Just add vnode_if.h to your SRCS and the rest happens automatically > via bsd.kmod.mk. It works great. I do it all the time. In fact, I > added SYSDIR support to bsd.kmod.mk at Timing Solutions so that we > could compile our drivers outside of the tree. As I understand it, this is the only file which is required from the kernel sources in order to build the arla port. ISTR FiST also needs it to be present, and I also think I once came across another port that needed it too. Is it really so wrong to make the lives of these third-party FS tools harder by requiring full kernel sources to be present? Kris -- In God we Trust -- all others must submit an X.509 certificate. -- Charles Forsythe To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message