From owner-freebsd-current Fri Dec 20 23:51:14 1996 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.4/8.8.4) id XAA01120 for current-outgoing; Fri, 20 Dec 1996 23:51:14 -0800 (PST) Received: from irz301.inf.tu-dresden.de (irz301.inf.tu-dresden.de [141.76.1.11]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.4/8.8.4) with SMTP id XAA01113 for ; Fri, 20 Dec 1996 23:51:11 -0800 (PST) Received: from sax.sax.de (sax.sax.de [193.175.26.33]) by irz301.inf.tu-dresden.de (8.6.12/8.6.12-s1) with ESMTP id IAA01559; Sat, 21 Dec 1996 08:51:01 +0100 Received: (from uucp@localhost) by sax.sax.de (8.6.12/8.6.12-s1) with UUCP id IAA00853; Sat, 21 Dec 1996 08:51:00 +0100 Received: (from j@localhost) by uriah.heep.sax.de (8.8.4/8.6.9) id IAA10113; Sat, 21 Dec 1996 08:47:48 +0100 (MET) From: J Wunsch Message-Id: <199612210747.IAA10113@uriah.heep.sax.de> Subject: Re: Problems with make world. To: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org (FreeBSD-current users) Date: Sat, 21 Dec 1996 08:47:48 +0100 (MET) Cc: dicen@hooked.net, sprice@hiwaay.net (Steve Price) Reply-To: joerg_wunsch@uriah.heep.sax.de (Joerg Wunsch) In-Reply-To: <32BAC0FA.41C67EA6@hooked.net> from "dicen@hooked.net" at "Dec 20, 96 04:38:18 pm" X-Phone: +49-351-2012 669 X-PGP-Fingerprint: DC 47 E6 E4 FF A6 E9 8F 93 21 E0 7D F9 12 D6 4E X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL17 (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-current@FreeBSD.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk As dicen@hooked.net wrote: > Just wanted to let everyone know /bin/sh is why a make world in current > fails. However, it seams to be okay in 2.2alpha now that I got a make > world to work from current down to 2.2alpha. Can you verify that exchaning both shell binaries works? Or is it rather that swapping kernels was it? Btw., Steve, i think exec'ing /bin/pwd is a heavy overhead that gains nothing. The shell should call getcwd(3). That's basically what pwd(1) actually does. (I assume the reason why the shell wanted to be `smarter' is that getcwd(3) used to be implemented in terms of calling pwd(1) for quite many systems in the past.) -- cheers, J"org joerg_wunsch@uriah.heep.sax.de -- http://www.sax.de/~joerg/ -- NIC: JW11-RIPE Never trust an operating system you don't have sources for. ;-)