Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 17 Apr 2023 07:30:21 +0100
From:      Jessica Clarke <jrtc27@freebsd.org>
To:        Alexey Dokuchaev <danfe@freebsd.org>
Cc:        "Stephen J. Kiernan" <stevek@freebsd.org>, "src-committers@freebsd.org" <src-committers@freebsd.org>, "dev-commits-src-all@freebsd.org" <dev-commits-src-all@freebsd.org>, "dev-commits-src-main@freebsd.org" <dev-commits-src-main@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: git: 6ae8d57652fa - main - mac_veriexec: add mac_priv_grant check for NODEV
Message-ID:  <8180B6AE-D70B-443D-80BA-1667E4642854@freebsd.org>
In-Reply-To: <ZDzdiRLxyEzDqRPq@FreeBSD.org>
References:  <202304162314.33GNEwXd039914@gitrepo.freebsd.org> <C919D121-5342-4A3A-8CEB-07B9346D8024@freebsd.org> <ZDzdiRLxyEzDqRPq@FreeBSD.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 17 Apr 2023, at 06:47, Alexey Dokuchaev <danfe@freebsd.org> wrote:
>=20
> Jessica,
>=20
> Please don't overquote: you complain about commit log, but included =
the
> commit diff in you reply.  Why?  This is quote annoying on slow =
networks
> and could cost people some cash on metered connection.

Seriously? I=E2=80=99m hardly the only one to do that sometimes, and =
there=E2=80=99s no
rule that I know of against it. I only trim when things get unwieldy,
but I=E2=80=99m not going to trim for a +45/-2 diff. My whole email was =
7 KiB
*including* headers, with the commit diff being about half that, and
it=E2=80=99s 2023. This is quite an outrageous complaint to make in my =
opinion
and I question why you=E2=80=99re going after me rather than anyone =
else,
especially when it=E2=80=99s about 3-4 KiB. Your complaint is already =
about 5%
of that, and this response is about 15%, so between them that=E2=80=99s =
20% of
the complained-about amount exchanged again. That=E2=80=99s how tiny the =
amount
of data you=E2=80=99re complaining about is.

> On Mon, Apr 17, 2023 at 12:40:07AM +0100, Jessica Clarke wrote:
>> ...
>> Hi Steve,
>> I see you've made a bunch of commits over the past few days that =
suffer
>> from not following the proper commit message formatting outlined in =
the
>> Committer's Guide
>=20
> What's exactly wrong with them?  They appear more elaborate and =
detailed
> than usual, I like this.

* The trailers shouldn=E2=80=99t have blank lines between them
* It=E2=80=99s Reviewed by, not Reviewers
* Subscribers isn=E2=80=99t a thing
* Some had Summary: as the first line of the body

These are all just a case of taking Phabricator=E2=80=99s auto-generated =
commit
message and pushing that without taking the time to turn it into a
message appropriate for FreeBSD.

Jess




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?8180B6AE-D70B-443D-80BA-1667E4642854>