Date: Sun, 26 Oct 2008 19:52:39 -0200 From: "Carlos A. M. dos Santos" <unixmania@gmail.com> To: "Eitan Adler" <eitanadlerlist@gmail.com> Cc: freebsd-ports <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: xclip dependencies Message-ID: <e71790db0810261452sb78d440k7cb4475d0ca092db@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <4904AB61.2070402@gmail.com> References: <48FB994A.1080704@gmail.com> <e71790db0810252046o65ee9639q170537b5fe43ccec@mail.gmail.com> <4903EDA9.10103@gmail.com> <e71790db0810252143q457d83fn839b23ac05db6ff8@mail.gmail.com> <4904AB61.2070402@gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, Oct 26, 2008 at 3:39 PM, Eitan Adler <eitanadlerlist@gmail.com> wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > Carlos A. M. dos Santos wrote: > <snip> > The makefile you provided works to install xclip it also reduces the > number of dependencies. I personally feel that it should be committed. > Any comments before I open a PR? The makefile clearly subverts the order by predefining USE_X_PREFIX as "no". It solves the problem but I'd prefer a general solution, perhaps removing the definitions of BUILD_DEPENDS and RUN_DEPENDS, in lines 2037 and 2038 of bsd.port.mk. I'm afraid, however, that this would break packages that don't list their run-time dependencies via USE_XORG. -- cd /usr/ports/sysutils/life make clean
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?e71790db0810261452sb78d440k7cb4475d0ca092db>