From owner-freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG  Sat Apr 29 09:47:05 2006
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG>
X-Original-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@hub.freebsd.org
Delivered-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@hub.freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C2D4316A403;
	Sat, 29 Apr 2006 09:47:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pav@FreeBSD.org)
Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [216.136.204.21])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 693B543D53;
	Sat, 29 Apr 2006 09:47:04 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from pav@FreeBSD.org)
Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (pav@localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by freefall.freebsd.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id k3T9l49H027945;
	Sat, 29 Apr 2006 09:47:04 GMT
	(envelope-from pav@freefall.freebsd.org)
Received: (from pav@localhost)
	by freefall.freebsd.org (8.13.4/8.13.4/Submit) id k3T9l1HI027940;
	Sat, 29 Apr 2006 09:47:01 GMT (envelope-from pav)
Date: Sat, 29 Apr 2006 09:47:01 GMT
From: Pav Lucistnik <pav@FreeBSD.org>
Message-Id: <200604290947.k3T9l1HI027940@freefall.freebsd.org>
To: yb@bashibuzuk.net, wxs@csh.rit.edu, pav@FreeBSD.org,
	freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org
Cc: 
Subject: Re: ports/96425: [UPDATE]: net/netdude and it's 2 related ports.
X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Ports bug reports <freebsd-ports-bugs.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports-bugs>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-bugs-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports-bugs>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-ports-bugs-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports-bugs>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-bugs-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 29 Apr 2006 09:47:05 -0000

Synopsis: [UPDATE]: net/netdude and it's 2 related ports.

State-Changed-From-To: open->closed
State-Changed-By: pav
State-Changed-When: Sat Apr 29 09:46:16 UTC 2006
State-Changed-Why: 
Committed, thanks!

Yes, USE_REINPLACE is now always assumed.

I think you should not be adding those USE_LIBTOOL_VER lines.
First, all these ports have it's own libtool included, second,
the current format of writing external libtool dep is USE_AUTOTOOLS.

http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=96425