From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Oct 29 21:54:07 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 07AAC1065670 for ; Thu, 29 Oct 2009 21:54:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rdivacky@vlk.vlakno.cz) Received: from vlakno.cz (77-93-215-190.static.masterinter.net [77.93.215.190]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B4FA18FC1C for ; Thu, 29 Oct 2009 21:54:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by vlakno.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4DC199CB3DC for ; Thu, 29 Oct 2009 22:53:15 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at vlakno.cz Received: from vlakno.cz ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (lev.vlakno.cz [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 1DAf8Lztu4li for ; Thu, 29 Oct 2009 22:53:13 +0100 (CET) Received: from vlk.vlakno.cz (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by vlakno.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id ED1739CB480 for ; Thu, 29 Oct 2009 22:53:12 +0100 (CET) Received: (from rdivacky@localhost) by vlk.vlakno.cz (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) id n9TLrCrq035188 for current@freebsd.org; Thu, 29 Oct 2009 22:53:12 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from rdivacky) Date: Thu, 29 Oct 2009 22:53:12 +0100 From: Roman Divacky To: current@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20091029215312.GA34302@freebsd.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="nFreZHaLTZJo0R7j" Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i Cc: Subject: [RFC]: m4 update X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 Oct 2009 21:54:07 -0000 --nFreZHaLTZJo0R7j Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable hi I made a patch that updates our in-tree m4 to the version from OpenBSD. Their version contains some gnu extensions and generally is modernized and rewritten. The patch (you have to in src/usr.bin/m4 for it to apply): http://vlakno.cz/~rdivacky/m4.patch I added their ohash* implementation to the m4 subdir as it uses it. I am not sure this is the correct way but it works for now.=20 So the question is - do we want this at all? If so, is this the way we=20 want it? I am open to all comments, thank you! roman --nFreZHaLTZJo0R7j Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.13 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAkrqDsgACgkQLVEj6D3CBEykXgCdGmDbLxoO93S5XVvs9NTcKNjM 86sAoIN3lzj55rQGSh+QdwkgKZTpfViN =L0IN -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nFreZHaLTZJo0R7j--