From owner-freebsd-arch Fri Feb 16 12:11:46 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Received: from smtp03.primenet.com (smtp03.primenet.com [206.165.6.133]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D3C8F37B4EC for ; Fri, 16 Feb 2001 12:11:43 -0800 (PST) Received: (from daemon@localhost) by smtp03.primenet.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) id NAA28313; Fri, 16 Feb 2001 13:08:38 -0700 (MST) Received: from usr05.primenet.com(206.165.6.205) via SMTP by smtp03.primenet.com, id smtpdAAAqRaaq3; Fri Feb 16 13:08:31 2001 Received: (from tlambert@localhost) by usr05.primenet.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) id NAA07275; Fri, 16 Feb 2001 13:11:29 -0700 (MST) From: Terry Lambert Message-Id: <200102162011.NAA07275@usr05.primenet.com> Subject: Re: Wish List (was: Re: The /usr/bin/games bikeshed again) To: n@nectar.com (Jacques A. Vidrine) Date: Fri, 16 Feb 2001 20:11:29 +0000 (GMT) Cc: Cy.Schubert@uumail.gov.bc.ca (Cy Schubert - ITSD Open Systems Group), arch@FreeBSD.ORG In-Reply-To: <20010216111144.C90210@hamlet.nectar.com> from "Jacques A. Vidrine" at Feb 16, 2001 11:11:44 AM X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL2] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > I did this just as proof-of-concept: no doubt there are caveats to a > big rollout. However, there is lots of activity in this area on the > various Kerberos lists. Microsoft even has documentation on their > website regarding interoperability with MIT Kerberos V. Interoperability only as a client, or have they documented their illegal use of the reserved field, so that you can be a server? My personal opinion is that they should be snubbed, so long as they insis they be treated as the only valid server OS. Terry Lambert terry@lambert.org --- Any opinions in this posting are my own and not those of my present or previous employers. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message