Date: Fri, 16 Feb 2001 20:11:29 +0000 (GMT) From: Terry Lambert <tlambert@primenet.com> To: n@nectar.com (Jacques A. Vidrine) Cc: Cy.Schubert@uumail.gov.bc.ca (Cy Schubert - ITSD Open Systems Group), arch@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Wish List (was: Re: The /usr/bin/games bikeshed again) Message-ID: <200102162011.NAA07275@usr05.primenet.com> In-Reply-To: <20010216111144.C90210@hamlet.nectar.com> from "Jacques A. Vidrine" at Feb 16, 2001 11:11:44 AM
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> I did this just as proof-of-concept: no doubt there are caveats to a > big rollout. However, there is lots of activity in this area on the > various Kerberos lists. Microsoft even has documentation on their > website regarding interoperability with MIT Kerberos V. Interoperability only as a client, or have they documented their illegal use of the reserved field, so that you can be a server? My personal opinion is that they should be snubbed, so long as they insis they be treated as the only valid server OS. Terry Lambert terry@lambert.org --- Any opinions in this posting are my own and not those of my present or previous employers. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200102162011.NAA07275>