From owner-freebsd-hackers  Tue Dec 10 21:20:40 1996
Return-Path: <owner-hackers>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.4/8.8.4) id VAA14695
          for hackers-outgoing; Tue, 10 Dec 1996 21:20:40 -0800 (PST)
Received: from dg-rtp.dg.com (dg-rtp.rtp.dg.com [128.222.1.2])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.4/8.8.4) with SMTP id VAA14676
          for <freebsd-hackers@freefall.FreeBSD.org>; Tue, 10 Dec 1996 21:20:36 -0800 (PST)
Received: by dg-rtp.dg.com (5.4R3.10/dg-rtp-v02)
	id AA22981; Wed, 11 Dec 1996 00:20:05 -0500
Received: from ponds by dg-rtp.dg.com.rtp.dg.com; Wed, 11 Dec 1996 00:20 EST
Received: from lakes.water.net (lakes [10.0.0.3]) by ponds.water.net (8.7.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id UAA17692; Tue, 10 Dec 1996 20:05:35 -0500 (EST)
Received: (from rivers@localhost) by lakes.water.net (8.7.5/8.6.9) id UAA01275; Tue, 10 Dec 1996 20:07:46 -0500 (EST)
Date: Tue, 10 Dec 1996 20:07:46 -0500 (EST)
From: Thomas David Rivers <ponds!rivers@dg-rtp.dg.com>
Message-Id: <199612110107.UAA01275@lakes.water.net>
To: ponds!freefall.cdrom.com!freebsd-hackers, ponds!quickweb.com!mark
Subject: Re: Daily panics (I'm back.)
Content-Type: text
Sender: owner-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

> 
> On Tue, 10 Dec 1996, Thomas David Rivers wrote:
> 
> > 
> > Ok - 
> [SNIP]
> > 	3) Would it be better to suffer through this for now,
> > 	   and wait for a more stable 2.2 version to try out
> > 	   (presumably _before_ 2.2-RELEASE was sent out.)
> 
> You can try out "2.2-ALPHA" - it's the precursor to the 2.2 release, which
> is suppose to happen in early Jan.  If you use CVSup, just add
> "tag=RELENG_2_2" and you'll get the 2.2 Alpha. It's been quite solid for
> me, although I haven't have as much time as I'd like to pound away at it
> harder...
> 
> Have fun,
> -mark

 Thanks for the suggestion - but I run on a (basically) uucp site;
my network connectivity is, shall we say, lacking... 

 So, I don't get use CTM or CVSup.

 What I'm thinking of doing is ordering the latest 2.2-SNAP from Walnut
Creek...  but, it may be too old...

 Also, if 2.1.5 binaries run fine on a 2.2 kernel (what about ps, et. al?),
I could just try the kernel...

	- Dave R. -