From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jul 26 21:48:02 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D1CE16A41F for ; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 21:48:02 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from admin@tigergroup.org) Received: from mail8.opentransfer.com (mail8.opentransfer.com [69.6.255.179]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 4760743D45 for ; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 21:48:01 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from admin@tigergroup.org) Received: (qmail 24228 invoked by uid 399); 26 Jul 2005 21:48:00 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ?192.168.0.100?) (68.47.19.148) by mail.opentransfer.com with SMTP; 26 Jul 2005 21:48:00 -0000 Message-ID: <42E6BD98.1060300@tigergroup.org> Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2005 17:47:52 -0500 From: Eriq User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.5 (X11/20050717) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: 4.11 vs. 5.4 stablity X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2005 21:48:02 -0000 I am running 4.11 on a dual amd box and have found it solid as a rock for running apache2, postgres, dns and postfix. But now I am thinking of upgrading. I wonder if 5.4 is as stable for these servers that must run 24/7. And is it worth all the trouble to do, I have grown pretty lazy :)