From owner-freebsd-ports Tue Apr 11 17:59:16 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from c000.sfo.cp.net (c000-h001.c000.sfo.cp.net [209.228.14.62]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B294B37BAEF for ; Tue, 11 Apr 2000 17:59:14 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from matt@boda.virtualave.net) Received: (cpmta 7381 invoked from network); 11 Apr 2000 17:59:13 -0700 Received: from slip-32-101-179-251.or.us.prserv.net (HELO boda.mine.nu) (32.101.179.251) by smtp.worldspy.net with SMTP; 11 Apr 2000 17:59:13 -0700 X-Sent: 12 Apr 2000 00:59:13 GMT From: Matt M. To: jim@luna.cdrom.com Subject: Re: gtk1.2.7 issues Date: Tue, 11 Apr 2000 17:58:42 -0700 X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.0.28] Content-Type: text/plain References: <00041117515900.00631@boda.mine.nu> <20000411175715.B16772@luna.cdrom.com> In-Reply-To: <20000411175715.B16772@luna.cdrom.com> Cc: ports@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <00041117591502.00631@boda.mine.nu> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Ok thanks. Didn't realize that it renamed it. On Tue, 11 Apr 2000, you wrote: > On Tue, 11 Apr 2000 at 17:52:20 -0700, Matt M. wrote: > > Just wondering why the port doesn't create/install gtk-config, which > > is required if you are developing your own gtk-based apps. > > It installs gtk12-config, because it makes it easier to co-exist with > other versions of gtk (gtk11, gtk10, etc.), which are still in the ports > collection. Why can't you 'ln -fs gtk12-config gtk-config' if you need > it to be gtk-config? > > - jim > > -- > - jim mock - walnut creek cdrom/freebsd test labs - jim@luna.cdrom.com - > - phone: 1.925.691.2800 x.3814 - fax: 1.925.674.0821 - jim@FreeBSD.org - > - editor - The FreeBSDzine - www.freebsdzine.org - jim@freebsdzine.org - To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message