From owner-freebsd-questions Fri May 21 8: 2:25 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mail.cybcon.com (mail.cybcon.com [205.147.64.46]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A300915404 for ; Fri, 21 May 1999 07:59:27 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from wwoods@cybcon.com) Received: from pdx.cybcon.com (wwoods@pdx.cybcon.com [205.147.64.44]) by mail.cybcon.com (8.9.0/8.9.0) with ESMTP id HAA25746; Fri, 21 May 1999 07:59:23 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 21 May 1999 07:59:23 -0700 (PDT) From: Bill Woods To: Dennis Ostrovsky Cc: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: egcs.... In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Hmmm.....has this been verified on the new 3.2 release? If this is the case, I will stick with gcc, as I have no desire to go 4.0-current right now opn this system Bill On Fri, 21 May 1999, Dennis Ostrovsky wrote: > On Fri, 21 May 1999, Bill Woods wrote: > > > I was toying with the idea of using the egcs in the ports (1.1.2 I > > believe) on my 3.2 system. Anyone useing egcs for everyday compiliong and > > anyone compiled the kernel with it. What are your observations? > > problems...and is it just a bad idea or does it work well. > > I was under the impression that egcs would not compile the kernel properly > under 3.x, although it does work (I think) for the 4.0-CURRENT tree. > > Dennis > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Dennis Ostrovsky ** Department of Chemistry ** Yale University > > E-mail: den@master.chem.yale.edu WWW: http://pantheon.yale.edu/~do33 > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message