From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Aug 19 20:29:56 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EB257A6A for ; Tue, 19 Aug 2014 20:29:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: from sdf.lonestar.org (mx.sdf.org [192.94.73.24]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mx.sdf.org", Issuer "SDF.ORG" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B3D153BFE for ; Tue, 19 Aug 2014 20:29:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: from otaku.freeshell.org (IDENT:case@otaku.freeshell.org [192.94.73.9]) by sdf.lonestar.org (8.14.8/8.14.5) with ESMTP id s7JKT7aB014624 (using TLSv1/SSLv3 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256 bits) verified NO) for ; Tue, 19 Aug 2014 20:29:20 GMT Date: Tue, 19 Aug 2014 20:29:07 +0000 (UTC) From: John Case X-X-Sender: case@faeroes.freeshell.org To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Did /nonexistent go away in FreeBSD 9 ? Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 19 Aug 2014 20:29:57 -0000 I point a particular application to a 7.x system using a login with /nonexistent as the home directory and /sbin/nologin as the shell. I copied the line from 'vipw' into a new 9.x system, and now when I try to connect, the application complains. I also have securelevel=2 ... So, did something change with /nonexistent in FreeBSD 9, or does securelevel=2 screw this up somehow ?? Thanks.