From owner-freebsd-wireless@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Apr 9 08:51:43 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB877106564A for ; Mon, 9 Apr 2012 08:51:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bschmidt@techwires.net) Received: from mail-wg0-f50.google.com (mail-wg0-f50.google.com [74.125.82.50]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 717B78FC14 for ; Mon, 9 Apr 2012 08:51:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wgbds12 with SMTP id ds12so4028417wgb.31 for ; Mon, 09 Apr 2012 01:51:42 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=sender:from:to:subject:date:user-agent:cc:references:in-reply-to :mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:message-id :x-gm-message-state; bh=+nK2r6118y/W5aNUnyIRcnzzz4/Y9foYODPJC3IJS6c=; b=XKkD6ApgTVpJ78ZH8sA7oVBj6Cz106ZsEV8OjUdqNwFYLYD+IipUzfZkHtwI8By8Ge 759FtdY6IgZXK22bAZIp1MVqjXxUQ6bqU7gaLdKvTEJZ4SNqnaSHe4fo/OmaplfT526X z+fzEHbtG9IEJWazvlhPH0uLcPxAE6UL+MLSmRS/U2RGu0FHn8BH+1UjxnXeS+OVd/sa YGmyexNuX+/tpyW+y+Up6kqT3BymwUPQWSVNYKgfY67EtpEJHVkrFSc0ZndyxgfIWW2h Huv6VpER+b09XEOHZUdJG3Xo8Xwi8T38BwrKMoC6UK9jt2hKuuzm9Git1hjOcYpcqZth OHkw== Received: by 10.180.83.198 with SMTP id s6mr14190387wiy.8.1333961502613; Mon, 09 Apr 2012 01:51:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: from amy.lab.techwires.net (dslb-088-065-060-108.pools.arcor-ip.net. [88.65.60.108]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id ea6sm28557795wib.5.2012.04.09.01.51.41 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Mon, 09 Apr 2012 01:51:41 -0700 (PDT) Sender: Bernhard Schmidt From: Bernhard Schmidt To: freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org Date: Mon, 9 Apr 2012 10:52:01 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.7 (FreeBSD/9.0-STABLE; KDE/4.7.4; amd64; ; ) References: <4f825599.e40c440a.4632.797d@mx.google.com> <1499821016.20120409122604@serebryakov.spb.ru> In-Reply-To: <1499821016.20120409122604@serebryakov.spb.ru> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <201204091052.02078.bschmidt@freebsd.org> X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQlaUYn6cKmkKpwpVVj6I46V3LOtCjUTxFJ6s3ASrFe7Rc7OB6F6Cg6zADl0TR5VicBof16j Cc: Subject: Re: Intel 6250 and WiMax X-BeenThere: freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Discussions of 802.11 stack, tools device driver development." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Apr 2012 08:51:44 -0000 On Monday 09 April 2012 10:26:04 Lev Serebryakov wrote: > Hello, Adrian. > You wrote 9 =D0=B0=D0=BF=D1=80=D0=B5=D0=BB=D1=8F 2012 =D0=B3., 7:20:48: >=20 > > I'm not sure.. Do we need a wimax stack with that? We do. Linux has a stack in net/wimax and the driver for the Intel devices is in drivers/net/wimax/i2400m In other words, no, we currently do not support the WiMax stuff of any of the Intel cards nor any other device afaik. > Here are driver for Samsung WiMax USB dongle, and it works as-is, > without any WiMax stack, as simple ethernet NIC. But, maybe, non-usb > devices are other story, I don't know. Guess it depends on the device driver, it might contain its own stack. =2D-=20 Bernhard