From owner-freebsd-arm@freebsd.org Thu Sep 28 01:25:11 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-arm@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0D232E2168C for ; Thu, 28 Sep 2017 01:25:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ian@freebsd.org) Received: from nov-007-i471.relay.mailchannels.net (nov-007-i471.relay.mailchannels.net [46.232.183.25]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5F17B68B7F for ; Thu, 28 Sep 2017 01:25:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ian@freebsd.org) X-Sender-Id: _forwarded-from|73.78.92.27 Received: from relay.mailchannels.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by relay.mailchannels.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9604010801B for ; Thu, 28 Sep 2017 01:24:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: from outbound1a.eu.mailhop.org (unknown [100.96.131.244]) (Authenticated sender: duocircle) by relay.mailchannels.net (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 4DC1C1083FF for ; Thu, 28 Sep 2017 01:24:57 +0000 (UTC) X-Sender-Id: _forwarded-from|73.78.92.27 Received: from outbound1a.eu.mailhop.org (outbound1a.eu.mailhop.org [172.20.63.30]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384) by 0.0.0.0:2500 (trex/5.9.14); Thu, 28 Sep 2017 01:24:58 +0000 X-MC-Relay: Forwarding X-MailChannels-SenderId: _forwarded-from|73.78.92.27 X-MailChannels-Auth-Id: duocircle X-Eight-Gusty: 37a011c44801a96e_1506561897774_1825536864 X-MC-Loop-Signature: 1506561897774:1107074363 X-MC-Ingress-Time: 1506561897774 X-MHO-User: d131be2a-a3eb-11e7-a893-25625093991c X-Report-Abuse-To: https://support.duocircle.com/support/solutions/articles/5000540958-duocircle-standard-smtp-abuse-information X-Originating-IP: 73.78.92.27 X-Mail-Handler: DuoCircle Outbound SMTP Received: from ilsoft.org (unknown [73.78.92.27]) by outbound1.eu.mailhop.org (Halon) with ESMTPSA id d131be2a-a3eb-11e7-a893-25625093991c; Thu, 28 Sep 2017 01:24:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: from rev (rev [172.22.42.240]) by ilsoft.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id v8S1OknP002943; Wed, 27 Sep 2017 19:24:46 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from ian@freebsd.org) Message-ID: <1506561886.31939.16.camel@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: if_awg fixes From: Ian Lepore To: Kurt Jaeger , Guy Yur Cc: freebsd-arm Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2017 19:24:46 -0600 In-Reply-To: <20170928011129.GC86601@home.opsec.eu> References: <20170928011129.GC86601@home.opsec.eu> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.18.5.1 FreeBSD GNOME Team Port Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-BeenThere: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Porting FreeBSD to ARM processors." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2017 01:25:11 -0000 On Thu, 2017-09-28 at 03:11 +0200, Kurt Jaeger wrote: > Hi! >=20 > >=20 > > I had issues with if_awg when passing heavy traffic > > (transmission, samba, ...) > [...] > >=20 > > Comparing the driver against if_nfe which also uses a ring buffer, > > there are several issues with how the rings are programmed. > > I made changes inspired by it. > >=20 > > The following fixes improved the card behavior on my boards. > > (tested on Orange Pi PC and Orange Pi One) > Will you submit your patches via https://bugs.freebsd.org ? >=20 > Otherwise it's difficult to keep track... >=20 Or as one or more reviews on phabricator, if you're already signed up there. =A0https://reviews.freebsd.org/differential/ -- Ian