From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Sat May 10 09:56:58 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D9B1C37B401 for ; Sat, 10 May 2003 09:56:58 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail.gmx.net (mail.gmx.de [213.165.64.20]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 6C7EB43FE0 for ; Sat, 10 May 2003 09:56:56 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from mdcki@gmx.net) Received: (qmail 29646 invoked by uid 65534); 10 May 2003 16:56:53 -0000 Received: from cvpn011.gwdg.de (EHLO gmx.net) (134.76.22.11) by mail.gmx.net (mp014-rz3) with SMTP; 10 May 2003 18:56:53 +0200 Message-ID: <3EBD2F95.9090807@gmx.net> Date: Sat, 10 May 2003 18:57:57 +0200 From: Marcin Dalecki User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.4a) Gecko/20030419 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en, pl, ru MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Yevmenkin, Maksim" References: <2E7E8A35375D1449A6F28D5E022E67310AC4D2@USSC8MS04.Global.Cwintra.Com> In-Reply-To: <2E7E8A35375D1449A6F28D5E022E67310AC4D2@USSC8MS04.Global.Cwintra.Com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: USB link cable? X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 10 May 2003 16:56:59 -0000 Yevmenkin, Maksim wrote: > this will create virtual ng0 network interface, which is different from > virtual > *ethernet* interface. if you need virtual *ethernet* interface you will need > to use ng_eiface(4) module instead of ng_iface(4), i.e. > > # ngctl mkpeer udbp0: eiface data ether > > this will create virtual ngethX *ethernet* interface. Right now my USB link cable stopped to work at all on the BSD side. I mean it stopped to work *permanently*. Neither BSD Linux nor Windwos XP recon it any more as a proper USB device. However they still detect that there is something there. **** READ - the hardware BROKE DOWN PERMANENTLY **** Excellent isn't it? > > So I have to ask if anybody ever got such a link running? > > Or would it just be easier to turn udbp.c in to if_udbp.c and > > forget about the reset? > > no. netgraph gives you a choice what of what you want to do. with > netgraph you > can turn udbp(4) pipe info network interface, ethernet interface or just > connect > to it with socket. > > max >