From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed May 21 16:57:03 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A5791065676 for ; Wed, 21 May 2008 16:57:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from shuvaev@physik.uni-wuerzburg.de) Received: from mailrelay.rz.uni-wuerzburg.de (wrzx28.rz.uni-wuerzburg.de [132.187.3.28]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 20B7F8FC17 for ; Wed, 21 May 2008 16:57:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from shuvaev@physik.uni-wuerzburg.de) Received: from virusscan.mail (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mailrelay.mail (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46823198E04 for ; Wed, 21 May 2008 18:57:01 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by virusscan.mail (Postfix) with ESMTP id 396D6198DFE for ; Wed, 21 May 2008 18:57:01 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mail.physik.uni-wuerzburg.de (wthp192.physik.uni-wuerzburg.de [132.187.40.192]) by mailmaster.uni-wuerzburg.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 24264198DFB for ; Wed, 21 May 2008 18:57:01 +0200 (CEST) Received: from wep4017.physik.uni-wuerzburg.de ([132.187.37.17]) by mail.physik.uni-wuerzburg.de (Lotus Domino Release 8.0.1HF110) with ESMTP id 2008052118565989-38129 ; Wed, 21 May 2008 18:56:59 +0200 Received: by wep4017.physik.uni-wuerzburg.de (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Wed, 21 May 2008 18:56:59 +0200 From: "Alexey Shuvaev" Date: Wed, 21 May 2008 18:56:59 +0200 To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20080521165659.GA8375@wep4017.physik.uni-wuerzburg.de> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Organization: Universitaet Wuerzburg User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01) X-MIMETrack: Itemize by SMTP Server on domino1/uni-wuerzburg(Release 8.0.1HF110 | April 11, 2008) at 05/21/2008 06:56:59 PM, Serialize by Router on domino1/uni-wuerzburg(Release 8.0.1HF110 | April 11, 2008) at 05/21/2008 06:57:00 PM, Serialize complete at 05/21/2008 06:57:00 PM Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at uni-wuerzburg.de Subject: Gnome reference framework bsd.gnome-reference.mk VS [NO]PORTDOCS X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 21 May 2008 16:57:03 -0000 Hello list! I am working on update to x11-toolkits/gtkdatabox2 and it has recently got an html reference (built using gtk-doc). The gtkdatabox2 is a rather rarely used port and its reference consists of app. 25 files (for now). What is better, - to create separate gtkdatabox-reference port, or - to intstall documentation from the existing port, under the control of NOPORTDOCS variable? The second question is about bsd.gnome-reference.mk framework discussed recently[1]. Althoug gtkdatabox is not an official part of gnome, it uses the same structure and therefore could be handled in the same way as other "official" gnome components. Are there any reasons to use one of: - devel/glib20-reference/bsd.gnome-reference.mk framework - handling docs on one's own? Thanks, Alexey. 1. http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports/2008-May/048645.html http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports/2008-May/048647.html