From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Feb 5 09:34:42 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DBCD516A4CE for ; Sat, 5 Feb 2005 09:34:42 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com (mail.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com [65.75.192.90]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5EADF43D41 for ; Sat, 5 Feb 2005 09:34:42 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) Received: from tedwin2k (nat-rtr.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com [65.75.197.130]) j159Ybj91534; Sat, 5 Feb 2005 01:34:37 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) From: "Ted Mittelstaedt" To: "Sandy Rutherford" Date: Sat, 5 Feb 2005 01:34:35 -0800 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.6604 (9.0.2911.0) In-Reply-To: <16900.34902.204175.909440@szamoca.krvarr.bc.ca> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1441 Importance: Normal cc: Giorgos Keramidas cc: Chris Hodgins cc: Gert Cuykens cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: RE: ssh default security risc X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 05 Feb 2005 09:34:43 -0000 > -----Original Message----- > From: Sandy Rutherford [mailto:sandy@krvarr.bc.ca] > Sent: Saturday, February 05, 2005 12:48 AM > To: Ted Mittelstaedt > Cc: Giorgos Keramidas; Gert Cuykens; freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; > Chris Hodgins > Subject: RE: ssh default security risc > > > >>>>> On Thu, 3 Feb 2005 22:54:14 -0800, > >>>>> "Ted Mittelstaedt" said: > > > restrictions somehow doesen't exist. Not to mention that > even without a > > static IP assigned > > to your home or other locations that you normally ssh in from, it's > > pretty > > simple to block off huge chunks of the Internet, particularly blocks > > assigned > > to Red China, where a huge amount of cracking and spamming > originates > > from. > > For what it's worth (not much), most of the cracking attempts that > have been showing up recently in my logs are from the USA. Interesting - I wonder if that is because the recent virus activity has opened up giant holes in the US. Ted